Critics slam proposed budget for relying on 'temporary solutions'

  1. HOME
  2. BUSINESS
  3. Critics slam proposed budget for relying on 'temporary solutions'
  • Last update: 1 days ago
  • 2 min read
  • 869 Views
  • BUSINESS
Critics slam proposed budget for relying on 'temporary solutions'

The Government of Jerseys recently proposed budget has faced scrutiny for relying on temporary solutions and lacking long-term planning. Deputy Helen Miles, who leads the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel, raised concerns about the financing of these plans following the panels review of the financial statement.

Deputy Miles also objected to the governments decision to reduce the contribution to the Social Security Fund in order to free up money for everyday expenditures. In response, the Treasury and Exchequer stated they would address the panels recommendations in due course.

Deputy Miles remarked: "The government claims the budget is guided by discipline, restraint, and sustainability, but in reality, it relies on short-term fixes with minimal long-term strategy." She noted that the panels findings align with those of the Fiscal Policy Panel, which recently highlighted that government spending is outpacing income.

In its budget proposal, the government explained that due to the "urgent need" to fund healthcare and childrens services, it intends a temporary adjustment to the States Grant to the Social Security Fund for 20262029. This adjustment is designed to cover both ongoing operational costs and capital expenses. "This approach avoids introducing new taxes or making significant long-term cuts," the proposal stated.

The Social Security Fund, which provides pensions and other benefits, is financed through contributions from employers, individuals, and government grants. Deputy Miles criticized the government for not conducting a full actuarial review to confirm the funds capacity before allocating it to future spending. "We would have preferred concrete evidence on the funds health before using it to support future expenditures," she added.

The Scrutiny Panel also noted that despite recognized pressures in the health sector, the budget fails to outline immediate steps to address these challenges, instead depending on longer-term strategies to create a sustainable funding model. If approved by the States Assembly, the health departments allocation will rise to 381 million in 2026, compared with 322 million in 2025.

In his foreword to the budget, Chief Minister Lyndon Farnham emphasized the governments commitment to modern healthcare facilities, preventative care, and digital health initiatives.

Deputy Miles stressed that the panel requires detailed evidence on health expenditure and the governments financial recovery plans. The Treasury and Exchequer responded: "We acknowledge the publication of the Corporate Services Panel's review of the proposed budget. The government will consider the panel's comments and respond accordingly."

Author: Ava Mitchell

Share