Grindr backs age verification bill proposed by two Republicans

Grindr announced in a blog post on Tuesday that it backs a controversial age verification proposal recently brought to Congress by Republicans Mike Lee of Utah and John James of Michigan. Known as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), the bill is scheduled for discussion in an upcoming House committee session and has received support from major tech companies including Meta, Snap, and X. However, it has also faced criticism, with opponents warning that it could grant organizations such as the Heritage Foundation the power to censor LGBTQ+ content and other online material.

Joe Hack, Grindrs head of Global Government Affairs, emphasized in the post that the platform invests heavily in safeguarding minors. "We dedicate substantial resources, including an age gate, device-level restrictions, human moderation, proprietary AI tools, and collaborations with child-safety organizations to prevent underage users from accessing the app," he wrote. Hack further noted, "We support Rep. John Jamess App Store Accountability Act because it reinforces these efforts. The bill establishes a secure, centralized age-verification system at the app-store level, enabling developers to receive verified age data. Nearly 90 percent of parents support this approach, which is safer and more uniform than requiring separate age verification across multiple apps."

Lee, who opposed a previous version of KOSA last year, explained that the earlier bill failed to adequately address major online threats to children and could have allowed federal overreach leading to political censorship. Meanwhile, the U.K. has implemented similar age-verification measures for apps like Grindr under its Online Safety Act, though enforcement has proven challenging and raised privacy concerns regarding government-issued IDs and facial recognition.

Tech journalist Taylor Lorenz has argued that legislation like KOSA may extend beyond child safety. In her newsletter Power User Mag, Lorenz warned that such bills could "eliminate online anonymity, expand big techs control, and jeopardize children by permitting organizations like the Heritage Foundation to block LGBTQ content, reproductive rights material, and discussions on feminism and equal rights." She also noted that the U.K.s Online Safety Act has already been used to impose strict controls over online speech under the pretext of protecting children and curbing misinformation.

Despite criticism, Lee expressed confidence in the bills progression through Congress, stating that he sees no legal or constitutional issues with the proposal and believes there is no reason to delay its consideration.

Author: Natalie Monroe