Fact Check: Be cautious of the assertion that DNA testing has proven Prince Harry is not the son of King Charles III

  1. HOME
  2. WORLD
  3. Fact Check: Be cautious of the assertion that DNA testing has proven Prince Harry is not the son of King Charles III
  • Last update: 6 hours ago
  • 2 min read
  • 697 Views
  • WORLD
Fact Check: Be cautious of the assertion that DNA testing has proven Prince Harry is not the son of King Charles III

In late 2025, a viral claim suggested that Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, had an emotional outburst in court after a DNA test supposedly revealed he was not the son of King Charles III. This assertion is entirely false.

The claim circulated widely on social media, including a Facebook video posted on November 30, 2025, showing a man resembling Harry shouting while two individuals restrained him. The caption read: "Prince Harry Goes Off the Rails in Court After Dismissing DNA Test: 'My mother didn't lie'" Many reposts of this video linked to advertisement-heavy articles hosted on WordPress sites.

Extensive searches across major news platforms, including Bing, Google, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo, found no credible reporting of any DNA test indicating Harry is not King Charles III's son. Such news would have been widely covered by reputable media outlets if true.

Analysis of the video itself revealed multiple signs of artificial intelligence manipulation. The person depicted had dark eyes, unlike Harry's natural blue eyes. The badge on the officer restraining him contained illegible symbols, a common indicator of AI-generated imagery. Additionally, the audio was out of sync, with the scream occurring before the mouth movements matched, further suggesting the footage was fabricated.

While this specific claim is false, speculation about Harrys parentage has existed for years. In his 2023 autobiography, Spare, Harry acknowledged persistent rumors linking him to James Hewitt, a British cavalry officer who had a relationship with Princess Diana in the late 1980s. Harry noted that King Charles never addressed these rumors, and historical records confirm that Harry was already a toddler before Diana and Hewitt met in 1986. Both Hewitt and Dianas former bodyguard, Ken Wharfe, have confirmed that Harry is indeed the son of Charles.

In conclusion, the story of a courtroom DNA test is entirely fabricated. The accompanying video shows clear evidence of AI creation, and no legitimate sources support the claim.

Author: Maya Henderson

Share