OpenAI Required to Provide 20M ChatGPT Logs in NYT Copyright Lawsuit

A federal magistrate in New York has mandated that OpenAI release approximately 20 million anonymized ChatGPT conversation logs to The New York Times and other parties involved, escalating the companys exposure to ongoing copyright and data governance challenges. The ruling, issued Wednesday, denied OpenAIs request to block the disclosure and instructed the company to provide the records under a protective arrangement.

The decision may have broad implications for AI developers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity, influencing how they gather training data, manage licensing, and establish safeguards around their systems outputs.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang emphasized that while user privacy is important, it is only one factor in the proportionality assessment, noting that it cannot override the clear relevance and minimal burden of providing the logs.

The order is connected to a lawsuit filed by the Times in December 2023, claiming that OpenAI trained its models using copyrighted news material without authorization. OpenAI responded in January 2024 with a countersuit, arguing that the publication misrepresented the situation.

The court determined that the 20 million chat log samples are proportional to the needs of the case for evaluating whether ChatGPTs outputs improperly reproduced NYT content. Over the past year, plaintiffs have sought wide access to generated content, while OpenAI has warned that releasing such a large volume of data would pose significant privacy and operational challenges.

In June, the court ordered OpenAI to preserve extensive ChatGPT user data for the lawsuit, including conversations that users had deleted. The conflict resurfaced in October when OpenAI challenged the production of the log samples, prompting the court to request clarifications from both sides.

Judge Wang also asked parties to clarify how the dispute related to earlier concerns over deleted logs and whether OpenAI had altered previous commitments regarding data disclosure.

Last month, OpenAI formally objected to the magistrates order, describing it as clearly erroneous and disproportionate, citing the requirement to disclose millions of private user chats.

The case is part of a larger wave of legal challenges against AI developers, with authors, news outlets, music publishers, and code repository owners testing how copyright law applies when AI models use protected material. Courts in the U.S. and Europe continue to evaluate similar disputes.

Author: Riley Thompson