Trump calls for 'deportation judges' to oversee chaotic courts

The U.S. immigration court system is struggling under a massive backlog, which in 2024 approached nearly four million cases and continues to expand. Addressing this backlog would require a significant increase in the number of judges to manage removal proceedings, asylum hearings, and other immigration-related cases.

The Trump administration, while acknowledging the need for more judges, has been removing those it views as too lenient. This week, eight immigration judges in New York were dismissed without explanation.

Immigration courts operate under the Justice Departments Executive Office for Immigration Review, not as part of the Article III federal court system. A recent recruitment campaign, titled You Be The Judge, aims to attract legal professionals to join the system, emphasizing the role of deportation judges tasked with shaping Americas future. Although this title does not appear in official job postings, it frames the role as one focused primarily on removals.

Immigration judges are meant to evaluate evidence impartially, but under the current administration, the messaging emphasizes removal outcomes. Over 600 judges nationwide hear hundreds of cases each day. The recent firings in New York reduce the court at 26 Federal Plaza to just 26 judges, more than a quarter below its staffing at the start of the year. This worsens pressures in a city where ICE agents have reportedly ambushed respondents attending their hearings.

Earlier in 2024, around 90 immigration judges were terminated across the country, including six in New York City. Only 36 of these positions have been refilled. Although $3.3 billion in federal funding was allocated to immigration courts, a statutory cap limits the total number of judges to 800far below the estimated 2,0003,000 needed to handle cases efficiently.

The Justice Departments recruitment ad highlights candidates who will make decisions with generational consequences and ensure only those with legally valid claims remain in the U.S. It prioritizes combating fraud over considering humanitarian reasons for asylum. The campaign mirrors the aggressive messaging previously promoted on Department of Homeland Security social media platforms.

Despite the overwhelming case backlog, immigrants retain the right to a hearing, which the Supreme Court has likened to protection against a punishment of the most drastic kind. Nevertheless, the administrations dismissals of judges and targeted recruitment suggest an effort to populate the courts with officials predisposed to approve removal requests without thorough review.

This approach represents a concerning threat to due process and the rule of law, reinforcing a system that could increasingly favor swift deportations over impartial adjudication.

Author: Harper Simmons