Rights groups caution against US raids during World Cup

Human rights organizations have voiced concerns ahead of next years World Cup draw, warning that strict US immigration measures could cast a shadow over the tournament. Groups including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) emphasized the risk of immigration raids near match venues.

These organizations urged FIFA to uphold its commitments to protect players, fans, and journalists. Daniel Norona, Americas advocacy director at Amnesty International USA, stated, Families, fans, players, and others in the football community should be able to enjoy the event without fear of detention or separation from loved ones.

The 2026 World Cup, set to be co-hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Canada, will feature 48 teams. The official draw is scheduled for Friday in Washington, D.C.

A recent Human Rights Watch report highlighted that between January and October, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) apprehended over 92,000 individuals near cities slated to host World Cup matches. The report also referenced the detention of an asylum seeker before the Club World Cup final in July.

In alignment with a broader deportation initiative, National Guard units have been deployed to some host cities, including Chicago and Los Angeles. Jennifer Li, a law professor at Georgetown University, urged clarification, saying, FIFA, host cities, and other organizations need to specify whether ICE, the National Guard, or other federal enforcement agencies will be present at the stadiums. This is not a hypothetical scenario.

Minky Worden of Human Rights Watch expressed concern over the US ending temporary legal protections for migrants from Haiti, which recently qualified for the World Cup for the first time in over five decades. Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLUs human rights program, warned, These policies endanger communities and risk compromising the integrity of the tournament. Without intervention, FIFA could inadvertently provide a platform for authoritarian practices.

Author: Gavin Porter