Doctor questions credibility of White House MRI story

Dr. Jonathan Reiner expressed skepticism regarding the White House's account of President Donald Trump undergoing an MRI last month. Speaking on CNN with Jake Tapper, Reiner, a medical analyst and former cardiologist for Vice President Dick Cheney, described the official explanation that the MRI was purely preventative as not plausible or credible.

Reiner emphasized that routine preventative care does not typically involve extensive imaging. They mentioned chest and abdominal scans, but the presidents doctor didnt clarify the type of scan. Was it an MRI, a CT, or both? he asked. He also pointed out that it was unclear whether any brain imaging was performed, suggesting that the White Houses narrative lacks detail and raises questions.

Its almost certainly connected to a specific symptom or medical concern, Reiner said, indicating that the MRI may have been prompted by observable physical signs rather than routine screening.

Earlier, President Trump told reporters that the MRI did not involve his brain, citing a cognitive test he had taken. Dr. Reiner speculated that the presidents gait, occasionally characterized by a leg swing while walking, could have influenced the decision to perform advanced imaging. Psychologist Dr. John Gartner has noted that this type of gait can be associated with frontotemporal dementia.

Initially, the president claimed he was unaware of why the MRI was necessary, though he described it as standard. The White House later attributed the imaging to Trumps age, releasing a statement from Dr. Sean Barbabella indicating that men in Trumps age group benefit from thorough cardiovascular and abdominal evaluations as part of an executive physical.

Medical experts have questioned this explanation. Reiner noted that preventative cardiac MRIs are not standard for men in their late seventies. Dr. Jeffrey A. Linder of Northwestern University also stated that advanced imaging is not a typical component of a presidential physical. The report is vague, and its unusual to perform this kind of test on a 79-year-old, Linder commented.

Author: Natalie Monroe