Supreme Court to consider Trump's dismissal of FTC member in examination of presidential authority

WASHINGTON, Dec 5 Next week, the U.S. Supreme Court will examine whether former President Donald Trump overstepped his authority when he removed a member of the Federal Trade Commission, raising critical questions about presidential power over independent agencies established by Congress. The case could also challenge a nearly century-old legal precedent.

The justices are scheduled to hear arguments Monday in the Justice Department's appeal of a lower court ruling that found Trump exceeded his powers by dismissing Democratic FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter in March, before her term had expired.

With a 6-3 conservative majority, the Supreme Court now has a chance to reconsider the New Deal-era Humphrey's Executor v. United States decision from 1935, which has historically protected heads of independent agencies from being removed at the presidents discretion. Supporters of the unitary executive theory argue that the president should have full authority to fire agency heads and select replacements freely.

Critics, however, emphasize that Congress designed tenure protections to insulate these officials from political pressures. Allowing removal at the presidents will could destabilize regulations relied upon by businesses, consumers, and the public.

Legal scholar John Yoo, formerly with the Justice Department under President George W. Bush, called the Slaughter case one of the most important questions of the last century regarding federal governance. He emphasized that the independence of agencies regulating finance, labor, aviation, and other sectors is at stake. Advocates of the unitary executive theory argue that presidential control over removals ensures that subordinates implement the presidents directives.

The Humphrey's Executor precedent originally protected FTC members from removal to prevent executive overreach into functions more legislative or judicial in nature than purely executive. Trumps firing of Slaughter parallels a 1935 dispute in which President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to dismiss a commissioner over policy disagreements but was blocked by the Court.

A 1914 statute allows presidents to remove FTC commissioners only for specific causes, such as misconduct or neglect, not simply for policy disagreements. Similar provisions cover over two dozen independent agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Experts warn that expanding presidential firing powers could diminish Congresss role in shaping agencies, which includes structuring, funding, and delegating authority. Such a shift would alter the balance established by the Constitutions separation of powers.

Recent Supreme Court decisions have gradually narrowed Humphrey's Executor but stopped short of overturning it. If the Court invalidates these tenure protections, it could allow presidents to replace agency leaders at will, potentially undermining regulatory consistency.

Slaughter was one of two Democratic commissioners Trump attempted to remove from the FTC before her 2029 term ended, drawing criticism from lawmakers and advocacy groups concerned about bias toward large corporations. Lower courts blocked her dismissal, but the Supreme Court temporarily allowed it while agreeing to hear the case.

Legal debates focus on whether modern expansions of FTC authority affect constitutionality. The Trump administration argues that agency powers now constitute executive authority, supporting removal at the presidents discretion, while opponents maintain that statutory protections remain valid regardless of regulatory scope.

Previously, in May, the Court permitted Trump to remove officials from other independent agencies, citing the presidents broad constitutional removal powers, a rationale applied again in July for other federal agency officials. In January, the justices will consider Trumps attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, which poses additional questions about agency independence.

Author: Aiden Foster