Louisiana man released on bail after 27 years on death row due to overturned conviction

  1. HOME
  2. US
  3. Louisiana man released on bail after 27 years on death row due to overturned conviction
  • Last update: 4 days ago
  • 2 min read
  • 23 Views
  • US
Louisiana man released on bail after 27 years on death row due to overturned conviction

Jimmie Duncan, a 57-year-old man from Louisiana, was released on bail following the overturning of his murder conviction earlier this year. He had been convicted in connection with the 1993 death of his girlfriends toddler, according to his legal team.

His release on Wednesday represents a major milestone in what his attorney, Chris Fabricant, described as a lengthy pursuit of justice. Fabricant highlighted the role of fraudulent forensic evidence in Duncans original conviction and labeled his imprisonment a severe miscarriage of justice.

Carrying out his execution would have been a profound moral injustice, Fabricant added.

Duncan was sentenced to life for first-degree murder in 1998 and had been held at Angola State Prison. He was released on a $150,000 bond, The Associated Press reported.

The Innocence Project, which has represented Duncan, stated that 4th Judicial District Judge Alvin Sharps ruling, which declared Duncan factually innocent, is currently under appeal to the states supreme court, with oral arguments scheduled for early next year. The district attorneys office that prosecuted the case did not respond to requests for comment. However, 4th District Attorney Steve Tew told NBC affiliate KTVE in West Monroe that his office intends to challenge the ruling.

The case stems from the death of 23-month-old Haley Oliveaux on December 18, 1993. According to the Innocence Project, Duncan briefly left the toddler alone in the bathtub, and when he returned, she was unconscious. He attempted CPR and sought assistance from neighbors who called 911. Haley later died at a hospital.

Duncans conviction was partially based on forensic analysis. Prosecutors claimed that bite marks found on the child matched Duncans teeth. In April, Judge Sharp cited Duncans expert witness, who rejected this claim and described bite mark evidence as junk science that is not scientifically defensible. Two experts who testified on Duncans behalf concluded that the toddlers death was likely accidental drowning rather than homicide. The ruling also found that Duncans trial attorney had provided ineffective assistance of counsel.

The Innocence Project noted that the forensic methods used in Duncans case have contributed to at least 39 wrongful convictions or indictments across the U.S. Since 1989, false or misleading forensic evidence has influenced roughly one-quarter of the nearly 3,800 cases documented by the National Registry of Exonerations.

Author: Sophia Brooks

Share