Leader of Lithuanian governing party convicted for inciting hatred against Jews

A Lithuanian court has found the leader of a governing coalition party guilty of inciting hatred against Jews, imposing a fine of 5,000 euros (approximately $5,800). The ruling, delivered on Thursday in Vilnius, centered around Remigijus emaitaitis' antisemitic remarks, which included minimizing the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany and downplaying the Holocaust in a highly offensive manner.

The district court stated that emaitaitis' actions went beyond acceptable limits of free speech, asserting that his rhetoric violated human dignity and was filled with hatred. The courts decision was less severe than the prosecution's request for a 51,000 euro fine (about $60,000), and it also did not include any requirement for compensation to victims of crimes.

The case stems from public statements and social media posts made by emaitaitis in May and June of 2023, in which he questioned the reaction of Lithuanian Jews and journalists to the destruction of Palestinian schools. In one of his posts, he made reference to an antisemitic nursery rhyme and made comments regarding events during World War II.

Judge Nida Vigelien emphasized that emaitaitis had used language that was derogatory and offensive, thus inciting hatred. Following the ruling, emaitaitis resigned from the Lithuanian parliament in 2024 after a constitutional court determined that he had violated his oath of office. Despite this, he returned to politics, leading the populist Nemuno Aura party in the subsequent election, which joined a coalition government under the center-left Social Democrats.

Though emaitaitis is not part of the Cabinet under Prime Minister Inga Ruginien, his actions have sparked political controversy. He was not present at the court session and dismissed the ruling as politically motivated. He also indicated plans to appeal the decision.

The Social Democrats, who lead the coalition government, have publicly condemned any form of antisemitism or hate speech, stating that such views contradict their values. They expressed respect for the courts decision but noted that the verdict is not yet final.

Author: Harper Simmons