Understanding the Eurovision Song Contest amid controversy over Israel's involvement

LONDON The Eurovision Song Contest, traditionally a celebration of music and international unity, is experiencing unprecedented turmoil as four countries have announced they will boycott the 2026 event in Vienna due to Israel's participation. Additional nations are reportedly considering similar actions.

Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, and Slovenia confirmed they will not compete next year after organizers refused to exclude Israel despite its involvement in the Gaza conflict. Iceland is currently debating whether to follow suit. The withdrawals have cast uncertainty over the future of the contest, impacting fans, broadcasters, and the events financial stability.

Eurovision analyst Paul Jordan noted that while a large-scale exodus is unlikely, the 2026 contest is expected to be tense.

A Contest Marked by Politics and History

Since its inception in 1956 to promote European unity after World War II, Eurovision has showcased musical talent from across the continent. Political messaging is officially banned, but international tensions have frequently influenced participation. Russia, for example, was expelled in 2022 following its invasion of Ukraine.

The conflict between Israel and Hamas, beginning with the October 7, 2023 attacks and Israels subsequent Gaza campaign, has led to widespread protests at recent contests. Calls to exclude Israel, which has participated since 1973, have grown louder in this context.

Organizers Attempt Compromise

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which manages Eurovision and includes 56 member broadcasters, introduced stricter voting regulations after accusations that Israel influenced public voting in favor of its contestant Yuval Raphael, who placed second behind Austria. While these rules were approved, no formal vote on Israel's participation occurred. The EBU stated that most members supported proceeding with the contest as planned under the new safeguards.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog expressed satisfaction with the decision and emphasized Eurovisions role in fostering cultural exchange and international friendship.

Immediate Withdrawals

Following the EBU announcement, broadcasters from Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, and Slovenia confirmed their withdrawal. Spains RTVE cited the situation in Gaza and Israels politicization of the contest as reasons for its exit. Icelands RUV is set to decide its stance in the coming week. In contrast, broadcasters in the U.K. and Norway welcomed the decision to retain Israel in the lineup, highlighting the importance of inclusivity and adherence to contest rules.

French officials also opposed the boycott, praising Eurovision for resisting political pressure and regretting the choice of some broadcasters to pull out.

Impact on Viewership and Finances

The withdrawing countries will neither send contestants nor broadcast the event, potentially reducing viewership for an event that usually attracts over 150 million viewers. Some broadcasters, such as the Netherlands NPO, plan to air the contest regardless, and digital platforms like YouTube will provide access in boycotting nations.

Financially, the boycott is significant. Eurovision relies on funding from participating broadcasters, and the absence of major contributors, including Spain, could strain the budget. At the same time, returning countries like Bulgaria, Moldova, and Romania help offset some of the losses.

Despite the controversy, more than 24 nations have confirmed participation, with a full list expected before Christmas. Jordan remarked that while ratings will be closely monitored, Eurovision remains a resilient institution.

Author: Ethan Caldwell