Trump's racism is terrible, but it's not comparable to 1930s Germany

During a lengthy and uneventful Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, President Donald Trump suddenly launched one of the harshest verbal assaults on immigrants in recent presidential history. He described certain immigrants as "animals," specifically targeting those who arrived during the Biden administration. Trump singled out individuals from Somalia, including Representative Ilhan Omar, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Minnesota.

While the intensity of his language was shocking, his hostility toward immigrants is not new. Trump openly stated, I dont want them in our country. Their country is no good for a reason. Their country stinks. And we dont want them in our country. He later added, Were going to go the wrong way if we keep taking in garbage into our country. Ilhan Omar is garbage. Shes garbage. Her friends are garbage. The following day in the Oval Office, he reiterated these sentiments.

This explicit anti-immigrant rhetoric reflects a longstanding theme in Trumps political career. Over the past month, he has publicly vowed to stop immigration from what he calls Third World Countries and to deport foreign nationals deemed non-compatible with Western Civilization. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem reinforced this approach, advocating on social media for travel bans on countries she claimed were sending "killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies." She framed this as defending the nations founders legacy of hard work and freedom.

Such extreme xenophobia has prompted comparisons to the notorious antisemitic rhetoric of 1930s Germany. Critics have drawn parallels between Trumps language and the way Jews were scapegoated by the Nazis, though these comparisons are complex and not entirely straightforward.

Historians note a key difference: Nazi propaganda explicitly defined Jews as a separate, nonhuman anti-race. Prior to the Nazi rise, Jews were integrated, though a minority, in German society. Once in power, the Nazis imposed a constructed racial identity and paired it with persistent, dehumanizing propaganda. As University of Maryland Professor Emeritus Jeffrey Herf explains, Nazi messaging portrayed Jews as a mortal threat to the German people, framing the Holocaust as an act of self-defense.

In contrast, while Trumps rhetoric dehumanizes immigrants, it does not construct a formalized racial ideology akin to the Nazi framework. Experts emphasize that historical comparisons are delicate, as it is unclear which stage of Nazism should serve as the benchmark. Early Nazi rhetoric, for instance, bears some resemblance to Trumps targeting of marginalized groups, but it did not yet manifest the systematic extermination policies that followed.

Another distinction lies in purpose: Nazis sought power to directly oppress Jewish people, whereas Trump has used attacks on immigrants largely as a political tool to consolidate support. This demonstrates a difference between targeting a group as an objective versus targeting them strategically.

Nevertheless, historians and commentators highlight that America has its own recurring history of xenophobia. From the mid-19th century Know-Nothing Party opposing German and Irish immigrants, to anti-Asian sentiment in the early 1900s, and opposition to Jewish refugees during the rise of the Nazis, the U.S. has seen cycles of hostility toward newcomers. Trumps rhetoric fits into this domestic tradition, though he has amplified it from the highest office.

In sum, while Trumps remarks are disturbing and overtly racist, equating them directly with the antisemitism of 1930s Germany oversimplifies historical differences. His actions echo patterns of exclusion and marginalization familiar in American history, but the systematic racial ideology and exterminatory goals of the Nazis are not mirrored in his administration. The comparison can serve as a cautionary lens, yet it should be considered carefully and contextually.

Author: Riley Thompson